Qt 4.5 to be LGPL
Bill Baxter
wbaxter at gmail.com
Thu Jan 15 18:54:30 PST 2009
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Katrina Niolet <katrina at niolet.name> wrote:
> Stewart Gordon Wrote:
>
>> Bill Baxter wrote:
>> > Qt 4.5 to be LGPL
>> > http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09%2F01%2F14%2F1312210
>> >
>> > Now we just need a D port...
>>
>> There was Indigo, not exactly a port but a library to mimic Qt's API.
>> http://www.dsource.org/projects/indigo/
>>
>> But that import is incomplete at the moment - I'll have to see what code
>> I still have. And maybe the project could be resurrected one of these days.
>>
>> Stewart.
>
> I'd say wait and see how the bindings work out. Long term a D port of Qt would be great, but it would take several developers years to get any real percentage of the Qt classes ported, and if the D bindings rock then there is little need (other than just the desire to have to have Qt in a more modern language)
Is there an irc channel or mailing list or google groups list for
discussions and questions about qtd?
--bb
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list