Any chance to call Tango as Extended Standard Library

[Yigal Chripun]

Christopher Wright wrote:
> Walter Bright wrote:
>> Yigal Chripun wrote:
>>> Walter Bright wrote:
>>>> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
>>>>> toe() ?! tail() good, rear() not so good, toe() sucks.
>>>>
>>>> tail() is no good because it has a well-established meaning in
>>>> programming of being everything but the first element of a list. I just
>>>> didn't like rear(), as it is not normally thought of as the opposite of
>>>> head().
>>>
>>> What was the reason for the use of body parts in the first place?
>>> What's wrong with:
>>> a) begin, end
>>> b) start, finish
>>> c) initial, final
>>> d) first, last
>>> etc...
>>
>>
>> There doesn't really need to be anything wrong with them. What's wrong
>> with head/toe?
>
> It sounds stupid.

it sounds stupid and is uninformative. for example,
auto cars = new BinaryTree!(Car)();
auto a = cars.toe;
auto b = cars.last;

now, reading the above, what's the toe of cars? that's just silly.

Does this make sense to English speakers? most likly. but for say, 
chinese? I don't know.

instead of inveting terms than imply something based on some phrase that 
not all non-native English speakers will recognize, it is far better to 
just use the proper English term for the last item - "last". KISS solution.