Yet a new properties proposal

[Rainer Deyke]

Sjoerd van Leent wrote:
> I understand your idea, but it is contrary to the common
> understanding that a property is a replacement of a field. As thus,
> from the users perspective, a property should look and act the same
> as a field.
> 
> The this rules out another symbol.

Unless fields use the same new symbol.


-- 
Rainer Deyke - rainerd at eldwood.com