Yet a new properties proposal

[Sjoerd van Leent]

Rainer Deyke Wrote:

> Sjoerd van Leent wrote:
> > I understand your idea, but it is contrary to the common
> > understanding that a property is a replacement of a field. As thus,
> > from the users perspective, a property should look and act the same
> > as a field.
> > 
> > The this rules out another symbol.
> 
> Unless fields use the same new symbol.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Rainer Deyke - rainerd at eldwood.com

Yes, but won't that reintroduce the problems that are already available?