Suggestion: Syntactic sugar for Exception handling in D2

[Robert Fraser]

Ulrik Mikaelsson wrote:
> Tomasz Sowiñski Wrote:
> 
>> I like it. Although it's only sugar you're right -- it helps reading a bit. But I would allow (or even require) "try" before a block of code:
>>
>> if (condition) try {
>>     ...
>> } catch (Exception ex) {
>>     ...
>> }
> Agreed. And while the use-case for if-statements may be rare, I can see a few cases in for-loops where it actually makes a little sense, but then it's better to be explicit about it;
> 
> foreach (item; collection) try {
>   process(item);
> } catch (StopException e) {
>   break;
> }

As Tomaz pointed out, this already works for statements (if, while, for, 
foreach, with, synchronized, etc.).