new D2.0 + C++ language

[Simen Kjaeraas]

Weed <resume755 at mail.ru> wrote:

>> I think the point you're trying to make is that a GC is more memory
>> intensive.
>
> + Sometimes allocation and freeing of memory in an arbitrary
> unpredictable time  unacceptable. (in game development or realtime
> software, for example. One hundred million times discussed about it
> there, I guess)

Then use the stub GC or disable the GC, then re-enable it when
you have the time to run a sweep (yes, you can).


> A need language that does not contain a GC (or contains optional). Many
> C++ programmers do not affect the D only because of this.

While GC in D is not optional, it can be stubbed out or disabled,
and malloc/free used in its place. What more is it you ask for?