new D2.0 + C++ language

[Weed]

Simen Kjaeraas пишет:
> Weed <resume755 at mail.ru> wrote:
> 
>>> I think the point you're trying to make is that a GC is more memory
>>> intensive.
>>
>> + Sometimes allocation and freeing of memory in an arbitrary
>> unpredictable time  unacceptable. (in game development or realtime
>> software, for example. One hundred million times discussed about it
>> there, I guess)
> 
> Then use the stub GC or disable the GC, then re-enable it when
> you have the time to run a sweep (yes, you can).
> 
	
Then a memory overrun

> 
>> A need language that does not contain a GC (or contains optional). Many
>> C++ programmers do not affect the D only because of this.
> 
> While GC in D is not optional, it can be stubbed out or disabled,

Then some part of the language will stop working (dynamic arrays, and
possibly delegates)

> and malloc/free used in its place. What more is it you ask for?

I need an optional GC and complete freedom to use the stack.