Compiled dmd2.032 in VC++ 2009!

[Walter Bright]

Don wrote:
> Actually I think that even DMD should be using a 128-bit emulator for 
> internal constants, regardless of the machine precision. That's a way 
> off, still, but I think emulator is the way to go, long-term. Likewise, 
> the compiler should not depend on NaNs being handled correctly in the 
> C++ compiler.

An emulator wouldn't be hard, I just have to get around to it :-)