Andrei's Google Talk

[Ellis Peters]

retard Wrote:

> Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:10:12 -0400, lurker wrote:
> 
> > Johannes Pfau Wrote:
> > 
> >> On 16.08.2010 22:36, lurker wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > This is unbelievable douchebaggery. The default ddoc IS good enough
> >> > for most of us. There is simply no need for more complex tools. I
> >> > think ddoc hits the sweet spot here by providing semi-professional
> >> > looking html documents. Like someone said earlier, you can always
> >> > spent a week worth of time creating a better tool for document
> >> > generation.
> >> > 
> >> > Doxygen STILL doesn't support D. What does this tell? It tells that
> >> > C++ is crappy for software development. The millions of C++ users
> >> > haven't been able to write a docgen support for D. It's just not
> >> > possible. OTOH a qualified compiler veteran such as Walter wrote a
> >> > better tool in less than a week, blindfolded.
> >> 
> >> What's the point of this post?
> >> I never wanted to replace ddoc in any way - the syntax is the best
> >> documentation syntax that I've seen, the WYSIWYG ideology is great and
> >> it's great that ddoc can output to different formats. If it sounded
> >> like I was flaming or something, I did not want to. (I agree, the last
> >> point about <,> is quite hypothetical)
> > 
> > Whatever. I feel insulted. :-(
> 
> And they try to convince themselves that I'm the troll..

Just. Go. To. Your. Ivory. Tower. period.