Andrei's Google Talk

[Justin Johansson]

On 17/08/10 06:57, retard wrote:
> Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:10:12 -0400, lurker wrote:
>
>> Johannes Pfau Wrote:
>>
>>> On 16.08.2010 22:36, lurker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is unbelievable douchebaggery. The default ddoc IS good enough
>>>> for most of us. There is simply no need for more complex tools. I
>>>> think ddoc hits the sweet spot here by providing semi-professional
>>>> looking html documents. Like someone said earlier, you can always
>>>> spent a week worth of time creating a better tool for document
>>>> generation.
>>>>
>>>> Doxygen STILL doesn't support D. What does this tell? It tells that
>>>> C++ is crappy for software development. The millions of C++ users
>>>> haven't been able to write a docgen support for D. It's just not
>>>> possible. OTOH a qualified compiler veteran such as Walter wrote a
>>>> better tool in less than a week, blindfolded.
>>>
>>> What's the point of this post?
>>> I never wanted to replace ddoc in any way - the syntax is the best
>>> documentation syntax that I've seen, the WYSIWYG ideology is great and
>>> it's great that ddoc can output to different formats. If it sounded
>>> like I was flaming or something, I did not want to. (I agree, the last
>>> point about<,>  is quite hypothetical)
>>
>> Whatever. I feel insulted. :-(
>
> And they try to convince themselves that I'm the troll..

You are not a troll my dear retard.  I am a troll.