What's the problem in opensourcing htod?

Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com
Tue Dec 21 14:34:51 PST 2010


Is htod a part of the C++ DM toolkit? I don't think it is, I mean it's
only useful for the D language. Sooner or later Walter is either going
to open-source it or we'll be forced to reinvent the tool. It's
probably wouldn't be much work for a C-only header translator.

On 12/21/10, Mariusz Gliwiński <alienballance at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dnia wtorek 21 grudzień 2010 o 23:08:34 Jonathan M Davis napisał(a):
>> On Tuesday, December 21, 2010 13:58:02 Mariusz Gliwiński wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > Why don't You make htod opensource? I don't think it has commercial
>> > potential, or I'm wrong? I'm asking, because it's a shame that people
>> > who
>> > wants publish D bindings have to make their own scripts for that (so
>> > bindings can be generated on !windows too).
>> > If there are no chances for getting htod, maybe someone know decent
>> > binding generators (scripting languages preferred)? The ones, which I've
>> > been using are too bad (i.e. stripping out const from various places).
>>
>> Just so you know, htod works on wine.
> I know, but it's still not correct way to treat developers that are working
> with you on multiplatform project. That's why I'm searching for
> multiplatform
> solution. It's not like i am going to design by hack, at least starting
> point
> shouldn't force people to emulate other emulating system for updating
> dependencies.
>
> Cheers,
> Mariusz Gliwiński
>


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list