poll about delete

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

Graham St Jack wrote:
> On 28/07/10 05:47, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> Max Samukha wrote:
>>> On 07/27/2010 10:53 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>> and scope storage class.
>>>
>>> If scope storage class is going, we need a library equivalent. Current
>>> 'scoped' is not good due to 4500.
>>
>> Agreed. I know how to fix it.
>>
>> Andrei
> 
> I missed the previous discussions about removing the scoped storage 
> class. Would you mind re-stating the argument here, or post a link to it?
> 
> FWIW I'm happy for delete to be removed.

In brief scope is unsafe and impossible to make safe without extensive 
changes to the language.

Andrei