poll about delete

[Graham St Jack]

On 28/07/10 07:50, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Graham St Jack wrote:
>> On 28/07/10 05:47, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> Max Samukha wrote:
>>>> On 07/27/2010 10:53 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>>> and scope storage class.
>>>>
>>>> If scope storage class is going, we need a library equivalent. Current
>>>> 'scoped' is not good due to 4500.
>>>
>>> Agreed. I know how to fix it.
>>>
>>> Andrei
>>
>> I missed the previous discussions about removing the scoped storage
>> class. Would you mind re-stating the argument here, or post a link to it?
>>
>> FWIW I'm happy for delete to be removed.
>
> In brief scope is unsafe and impossible to make safe without extensive
> changes to the language.
>
> Andrei

Thanks. I definitely agree that it should go if it can't be made to work 
properly.

-- 
Graham St Jack