FFT Lib?

[Philippe Sigaud]

>
>
>
>  3.  If I do end up writing my own or porting, is there sufficient interest
>> in
>> this that I should try to target it for std.numerics, or would I be better
>> off
>> just making it good enough for my use case?
>>
>
> I think that a basic power-of-2 FFT is simple enough, and sufficiently
> widely used to be worth including.
>

You have my vote, David. As long as it does 2D FFT, it'll cover the vast
majority of my own needs. And FFT is exactly the kind of things I need
regularly, but only a few times a year. Having it in std.numerics would be
excellent.


Philippe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20100728/6046e344/attachment.html>