Is there ANY chance we can fix the bitwise operator precedence rules?

[BCS]

Hello Jonathan,

> "goto case" does seem a bit silly, but I think that it's clearer and
> less error prone for anyone who understands "goto case."

Say I have some code with a fall through. If I use the goto case X; version, 
it allows the cases to be freely reordered. OTOH if I use the other option, 
it doesn't. I think that the more likely error is for someone to rearrange 
my code and not notice that a case falls thought (with goto case; this causes 
a bug) rather than rearrange it and expect it to fall through where it doesn't 
(with goto case X; this causes a bug). For one thing, if you want it to fall 
thought, you are already thinking about that issue.

-- 
... <IXOYE><