Article about problems & suggestions for D 2.0
dsimcha
dsimcha at yahoo.com
Tue Aug 30 17:25:15 PDT 2011
On 8/30/2011 8:01 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
> I'd like to say that the 'shared' attribute on member functions should just mean "make this member visible through a shared reference" and do away with the memory barriers idea entirely, except that D really does need some form of atomics. I'm really not sure what the solution is here.
What's wrong with core.atomic?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list