Article about problems & suggestions for D 2.0

[Sean Kelly]

I meant atomic types, though I could probably be convinced otherwise.

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 30, 2011, at 5:25 PM, dsimcha <dsimcha at yahoo.com> wrote:

> On 8/30/2011 8:01 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
> 
>> I'd like to say that the 'shared' attribute on member functions should just mean "make this member visible through a shared reference" and do away with the memory barriers idea entirely, except that D really does need some form of atomics.  I'm really not sure what the solution is here.
> 
> What's wrong with core.atomic?