renamepalooza time

[Ali Çehreli]

spir wrote:
 > On 01/23/2011 12:03 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:

 > Sounds similar to
 > using whitespace for visual grouping like in
 >     a*b + c*d
 > or
 >     [ [1,2,3] , [4,5,6] ]
 >
 > But may be a bit too complicated for a public, free-willing, style,
 > don't you think? Rather for an enforced project or corporate one, I'd
 > say...

Agreed, but I will keep using an underscore after "is". Another reason 
why I do so is, when used with camelcase, that little "is" capitalizes 
the next word just to be consistent with the camelcase part of the 
naming conventions. When we have an attribute of an object named 
'ready', 'isReady()' doesn't match because 'ready' doesn't match 
'Ready'. An underscore makes it stay lowercased:

     is_ready();

The attribute can follow the camelcase rule and be consistent with the 
rest of the names:

     is_lastItem();

Ali