Would user polls be useful? (Was: Re: std.unittests [updated] for review)

[Jens Mueller]

spir wrote:
> On 01/30/2011 01:13 PM, Jens Mueller wrote:
> >I do not like putting it in std.exception. Maybe the name std.unittest
> >is also not good. I would propose std.assert if assert wasn't a keyword.
> >[...]
>  I would_not_  expect helpers for writing
> >assertions (Assert_Error_) in a module named std.exception.
> 
> Same for me. Find it strange. Would never search assertion helper
> funcs inside std.exception. Why not std.assertion? std.unittests
> would be fine if there were some more stuff in there, I mean not
> only assertions. Else, the obvious name imo is std.assertion.

Nice. I just wonder what others think.
I'd like to start a poll
http://doodle.com/vn2ceenuvfwtx38e
In general are those polls useful? I mean there where some
discussions in the last time where a poll may help. git vs. hg. 80 vs.
90 characters per line. If all arguments are on the table it can be
useful to have an opinion poll to finally settle the discussion.

It may even be that I'm totally wrong here. But I think the module
naming needs to be done very careful. It's what a D newcomer needs to
grasp as easy as possible. Am I too picky? Somehow I care (too?) much
about names.

Jens