Naming convention in Phobos

[spir]

On 03/06/2011 04:27 PM, foobar wrote:
>>> Are there other concerns?
>> >
>> >  I think that every individual variable, function and type in Phobos should
>> >  use the naming convention of whatever random language the author happened to
>> >  be thinking of when they wrote it. That way Phobos won't seem messy. Plus,
>> >  the lack of any sensible rules would make it super-easy to remember all the
>> >  different spellings, punctuations and capitalizations.
>> >
>> >
>> >
> I would also add to the above excellent point that in order to prevent unworthy people of programming in the holly D programming language we must require every D programmer to be fluent in English, Latin and Greek (including cultural references to movies and such), have *at least* expert Unix hacking credentials, have a certified MSFT engineering diploma, be Guru level programmers in all of the following: c, c++, Haskell, Perl, APL, LISP, ALGOL and COBOL.
> AND, lest we forget, they must code ONLY in a terminal based text-editor with 80 character wide lines.

Thus, if I understand correctly, the D community finally let down all 
prerequisites in fields of mathematical logics, philosophy of language, and 
metaphysics of automata? Or what?

Denis
-- 
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com