Naming convention in Phobos

[foobar]

spir Wrote:

> On 03/06/2011 04:27 PM, foobar wrote:
> >>> Are there other concerns?
> >> >
> >> >  I think that every individual variable, function and type in Phobos should
> >> >  use the naming convention of whatever random language the author happened to
> >> >  be thinking of when they wrote it. That way Phobos won't seem messy. Plus,
> >> >  the lack of any sensible rules would make it super-easy to remember all the
> >> >  different spellings, punctuations and capitalizations.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> > I would also add to the above excellent point that in order to prevent unworthy people of programming in the holly D programming language we must require every D programmer to be fluent in English, Latin and Greek (including cultural references to movies and such), have *at least* expert Unix hacking credentials, have a certified MSFT engineering diploma, be Guru level programmers in all of the following: c, c++, Haskell, Perl, APL, LISP, ALGOL and COBOL.
> > AND, lest we forget, they must code ONLY in a terminal based text-editor with 80 character wide lines.
> 
> Thus, if I understand correctly, the D community finally let down all 
> prerequisites in fields of mathematical logics, philosophy of language, and 
> metaphysics of automata? Or what?
> 
> Denis
> -- 
> _________________
> vita es estrany
> spir.wikidot.com
> 

Oh my, I forgot those! 

Don't be silly, The D prerequisites can only grow. It is cosmologically impossible to remove anything since it is written in punch-cards (which is worse than writing in stones).