Website message overhaul

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

At any rate, I wouldn't want the D intro page to mention any other language.

Andrei

On 11/17/11 8:05 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the only issue with your sentence is that the "efficiency of native code" is
> also
> possible with C#.
>
> --
> Paulo
>
> "Daniel Gibson"<metalcaedes at gmail.com>  wrote in message
> news:ja10k6$27j8$1 at digitalmars.com...
>> Am 16.11.2011 02:24, schrieb Jude Young:
>>>
>>> I see one camp that is against using multi-paradigm on the basis that
>>> it sounds buzz-wordy, and another camp for using because it does
>>> actually mean something specific.
>>
>>
>> I'm not against calling D "multi paradigm", I'm just against the style of
>> the "Modern convenience. Multi-paradigm power. Native efficiency."
>> sentences. It *sounds* buzzwordy, regardless of the words.
>> Even "Rusty bars. Heavy chains. Merciless guards." sounds like a cheap
>> commercial ;)
>>
>> OTOH "D is a modern, powerful multi-paradigm programming language that
>> combines the efficiency of native code with the convenience of modern
>> languages like C#" contains all those buzzwords but doesn't sound as bad.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> - Daniel
>
>