Website message overhaul

[Sean Kelly]

If you compare your product to another one you're implying that the other product is better in some way. Generally a bad idea to do so. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 17, 2011, at 10:34 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote:

> At any rate, I wouldn't want the D intro page to mention any other language.
> 
> Andrei
> 
> On 11/17/11 8:05 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> the only issue with your sentence is that the "efficiency of native code" is
>> also
>> possible with C#.
>> 
>> --
>> Paulo
>> 
>> "Daniel Gibson"<metalcaedes at gmail.com>  wrote in message
>> news:ja10k6$27j8$1 at digitalmars.com...
>>> Am 16.11.2011 02:24, schrieb Jude Young:
>>>> 
>>>> I see one camp that is against using multi-paradigm on the basis that
>>>> it sounds buzz-wordy, and another camp for using because it does
>>>> actually mean something specific.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I'm not against calling D "multi paradigm", I'm just against the style of
>>> the "Modern convenience. Multi-paradigm power. Native efficiency."
>>> sentences. It *sounds* buzzwordy, regardless of the words.
>>> Even "Rusty bars. Heavy chains. Merciless guards." sounds like a cheap
>>> commercial ;)
>>> 
>>> OTOH "D is a modern, powerful multi-paradigm programming language that
>>> combines the efficiency of native code with the convenience of modern
>>> languages like C#" contains all those buzzwords but doesn't sound as bad.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> - Daniel
>> 
>> 
>