@property

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Sunday, August 05, 2012 04:17:13 bearophile wrote:
> Adam D. Ruppe:
> > I should add: if a function is not marked @property, it should
> > not change at all: it should be callable with and without
> > parens,
> 
> I think I'd like functions not marked with @property to require
> the ().

I wholeheartedly agree, but it's a divisive subject. Some of us feel very 
strongly that functions not marked with @property should require parens, and 
others feel very strongly that they should be optional.

- Jonathan M Davis