@property

[Adam D. Ruppe]

On Sunday, 5 August 2012 at 02:17:18 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> I think I'd like functions not marked with @property to require 
> the ().

You have the -property switch for breaking piles of perfectly 
good code while enabling no new functionality.

What I'm doing is completely independent of -property: I'm making 
@properties actually work.


And I'm almost there... I just got the struct members working but 
introduced a regression where dmd assert fails.