Moving towards D2 2.061 (and D1 1.076)

[kenji hara]

I think we should have -future/-f switch and @future attribute.
It is a rough idea, but seems a required compiler feature.

Kenji Hara

2012/12/14 Walter Bright <newshound2 at digitalmars.com>

> On 12/13/2012 5:33 PM, kenji hara wrote:
>
>> Yet not released feature is not visible for almost D users.
>> What you are going to do in 2.061 is to add a warned feature suddenly.
>>
>> But, it is certainly no problem for almost D users (unless users use old
>> @[]
>> syntax, compiler never warn). I think what you must to do is to cut the
>> time
>> limit of removing @[] syntax. X months after?  In version 2.0yy?
>> You should say much better answer than *in the future*.
>>
>
> I think in the past we've been too hasty sometimes in removing things. I
> think a better approach will be to allow some time to elapse, and then ask
> in the ng if there will be any problems with moving to the next stage.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20121214/44f0935e/attachment-0001.html>