System programming in D (Was: The God Language)

[Manu]

On 5 January 2012 22:47, Walter Bright <newshound2 at digitalmars.com> wrote:

> On 1/5/2012 1:02 AM, Manu wrote:
>
>> My argument is that even IF the compiler some day attempts to make vector
>> optimisations to float[4] arrays, the raw hardware should be exposed
>> first, and
>> allow programmers to use it directly. This starts with a language defined
>> (platform independant) v128 type.
>>
>
> Manu, I appreciate your expertise in this manner, which I lack. I think
> you've made a great case. Can you flesh this out with more specific
> suggestions on what language changes would work best?
>

Love to. I'll give it some thorough thought. There's more details than I
think most would expect...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20120105/3c2cf454/attachment.html>