Reference semantic ranges and algorithms (and std.random)

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling]

On 25/09/12 18:36, monarch_dodra wrote:
> Thank you for bringing it up. The problem is indeed as you said, and making the
> PRNGs references types fixes it.
>
> I have a pretty well developed first iteration. I hope that by the end of next
> week, I'll have something to show.

That would be fantastic.  I'm a bit compromised right now time-wise but do ping 
me if I can do anything to help you test stuff, particularly wrt RandomSample.