To help LDC/GDC

[Artur Skawina]

On 04/09/13 12:51, kenji hara wrote:
> 2013/4/9 Timon Gehr <timon.gehr at gmx.ch <mailto:timon.gehr at gmx.ch>>
> 
>     On 04/09/2013 12:13 PM, Artur Skawina wrote:
> 
> [snip] 
> 
> 
>         That's not pure by any definition,
> 
> 
>     I'd counter that it is pure by the D definition.
> 
> 
> I completely agree with Timon. It's the definition in D.

A function that both directly depends on global mutable state (and
modifies it) can hardly be called pure. Can you (anybody) give a
D "pure" definition that allows for the program that I've posted
and still makes "pure" useful?

artur