To help LDC/GDC

[kenji hara]

2013/4/9 Timon Gehr <timon.gehr at gmx.ch>

> On 04/09/2013 12:13 PM, Artur Skawina wrote:
>
[snip]

>
>> That's not pure by any definition,
>>
>
> I'd counter that it is pure by the D definition.
>

I completely agree with Timon. It's the definition in D.
The meaning of 'pure' keyword in D *contains* widely used "pure" meaning,
rather than differ. The usefulness of the three purity (weak-const-strong)
is still there, and the keyword choice for the concept is enough reasonable.

Kenji Hara
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20130409/d911825c/attachment-0001.html>