To help LDC/GDC

Zach the Mystic reachzach at gggggmail.com
Tue Apr 9 19:07:33 PDT 2013


On Tuesday, 9 April 2013 at 16:41:08 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling 
wrote:
> On 04/09/2013 10:21 AM, Zach the Mystic wrote:
>> deadalnix answered but too briefly it seems. I think the 
>> reason it's pure is
>> because a struct's member functions are actually a kind of 
>> syntax sugar.
>
> Stepping outside from any controversy for now, I think I should 
> say that these
> kind of in-depth discussions and explanations of the subtleties 
> of language
> features (and programming theory in general) are one of the 
> reasons I really,
> really enjoy being part of the D community. :-)

Thanks, man! The truth is, compared to some of the heavyweights 
here, I'm very new to programming. That being said, I DO endeavor 
to really understand what's going on with the inner workings. I 
don't want anything to be mysterious which doesn't have to be!


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list