Is there any plans to make working signals in D?

[Robert]

There is: http://wiki.dlang.org/Review_Queue

It is currently blocked by:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8441

There is already a pull request for 8441, but it was not merged yet.

As soon as 8441 gets fixed, I am going to finish up the implementation
to make it ready for review.

For an overview of fixes and improvements over the current
implementation, simply search the forums for std.signals2.

Best regards,
Robert

On Sun, 2013-04-14 at 11:06 +0400, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
> For "working signals" I suppose will be enough fixing of both Issue 9606 
> [1] and Issue 9603 [2].
> 
> IMO, for the first issue we need weak references [3].
> IMO, for the second issue we need to make regular D objects on closures 
> [4] and fix Issue 9602 [5].
> 
> Any thoughts about my proposal to make signals working in D? Other 
> proposals? Any (approximate) period for [proposal parts] to be implemented?
> 
> Also, does anybody think currently D has working signals and I'm just 
> slander in the title?
> 
> P.S.
> Also there is a proposal for new signals implementation without compiler 
> changes [6].
> 
> 
> [1] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9606
> [2] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9603
> [3] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4151
> [4] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9601
> [5] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9602
> [6] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9347
>