Is there any plans to make working signals in D?

[deadalnix]

On Sunday, 14 April 2013 at 07:06:12 UTC, Denis Shelomovskij 
wrote:
> For "working signals" I suppose will be enough fixing of both 
> Issue 9606 [1] and Issue 9603 [2].
>
> IMO, for the first issue we need weak references [3].
> IMO, for the second issue we need to make regular D objects on 
> closures [4] and fix Issue 9602 [5].
>
> Any thoughts about my proposal to make signals working in D? 
> Other proposals? Any (approximate) period for [proposal parts] 
> to be implemented?
>
> Also, does anybody think currently D has working signals and 
> I'm just slander in the title?
>
> P.S.
> Also there is a proposal for new signals implementation without 
> compiler changes [6].
>
>
> [1] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9606
> [2] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9603
> [3] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4151
> [4] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9601
> [5] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9602
> [6] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9347

Can you expand yourself on the subject ? I did followed 
discussion on the topic, and so this thread is quite hard to 
follow.