Stable D version?

[SomeDude]

On Tuesday, 23 April 2013 at 20:21:55 UTC, eles wrote:
> On Tuesday, 23 April 2013 at 18:57:46 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
> wrote:
>> On 4/23/13 2:42 PM, eles wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 23 April 2013 at 14:26:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
>> I was mainly referring to the fact that C++ succeeded in spite 
>> of having initially an incomplete specification. Nowadays the 
>> expectations are much higher.
>>
>> Andrei
>
> As long as you keep changing the language, no specification 
> will ever be complete.
>
> C++ will long advance. D must be out and living before C++14. 
> Then, it will be too late. My view.

I also think when modules are integrated into the C++ standard, 
for most developers, there won't be any case left for D. Even 
though D technically is superior in almost every way, 
conservatism is strong enough.