Stable D version?
Dicebot
m.strashun at gmail.com
Sun Apr 28 03:03:41 PDT 2013
On Sunday, 28 April 2013 at 09:24:13 UTC, SomeDude wrote:
> I also think when modules are integrated into the C++ standard,
> for most developers, there won't be any case left for D. Even
> though D technically is superior in almost every way,
> conservatism is strong enough.
C++ will never be sufficiently changed to leave no chance for
other native languages. It is doomed because of mandatory
backwards compatibility with huge legacy package. Main issues of
C++ are not lack of advanced features but inconvenient design of
basic features.
Well, D is trying to have its own share of those issues too :P
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list