Inherent code performance advantages of D over C?

Adam D. Ruppe destructionator at gmail.com
Tue Dec 10 13:52:10 PST 2013


On Tuesday, 10 December 2013 at 21:28:41 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> Those are implementation issues, right?

Yeah, a lot of the blame can be placed on the intertwined phobos 
modules. D without phobos is a lot faster to compile (and 
produces significantly smaller exes).


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list