Inherent code performance advantages of D over C?

[H. S. Teoh]

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:52:10PM +0100, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Tuesday, 10 December 2013 at 21:28:41 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> >Those are implementation issues, right?
> 
> Yeah, a lot of the blame can be placed on the intertwined phobos
> modules. D without phobos is a lot faster to compile (and produces
> significantly smaller exes).

That's why I proposed reducing Phobos interdependencies. Didn't sound
like it caught on, though. :-( 


T

-- 
This sentence is false.