C++ guys hate static_if?

[Iain Buclaw]

On 13 March 2013 14:12, deadalnix <deadalnix at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday, 13 March 2013 at 14:06:33 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
>> On 13 March 2013 08:29, Klaim - Joël Lamotte <mjklaim at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  Just for complete information, the static_if feature isn't rejected but
>>> discussion/effort on it is now delayed.
>>> See minutes: http://isocpp.org/files/**papers/N3576.pdf<http://isocpp.org/files/papers/N3576.pdf>
>>> My understanding is that focusing on concepts(-light) is a priority for
>>> this working group now.
>>>
>>> Walter was in the meeting so he got the details.
>>>
>>>
>>>  Looking at the minutes, that was Walter Brown, not Bright.  Incase you
>> got
>> confused about the difference. ;)
>>
>
> Are you saying that Walter Brown isn't bright ?
>
> /me runaway
>

He's neither Black, Blue, or Bubblegum flavour either.


-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20130313/0652ee01/attachment.html>