DIP61: redone to do extern(C++,N) syntax
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Apr 28 07:45:14 PDT 2014
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:37:36 -0400, Byron <byron.heads at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> why not import _cpp = bar; ?
That doesn't help. foo.func() is still ambiguous. With this proposal, you
have hijacked the meaning of namespace lookup. When I say x.y.z, it
doesn't just mean look for symbol z in module x/y.d, it can also mean to
look for symbol z in C++ namespace x::y. This was not the case with C
binding, which continued to use D modules for symbol lookup.
Consider that a boatload of C++ code is named std::something. Now,
std.string has an ambiguous meaning wherever it is used!
-Steve
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list