proposal: allow 'with(Foo):' in addition to 'with(Foo){..}'

[Era Scarecrow via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 10 August 2014 at 23:16:57 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> If this is going to be accepted I will most likely resort to 
> DScanner rule that statically prohibits it, don't like such 
> features. Even "attribute:" syntax can easily result in code 
> obfuscation and should be used with caution - and this one is 
> worse.

  Yeah i guess extra complexity for assisting tools 
(auto-completion and the like) need to be considered as well...