proposal: allow 'with(Foo):' in addition to 'with(Foo){..}'

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 10 August 2014 at 23:29:17 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
> On Sunday, 10 August 2014 at 23:16:57 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> If this is going to be accepted I will most likely resort to 
>> DScanner rule that statically prohibits it, don't like such 
>> features. Even "attribute:" syntax can easily result in code 
>> obfuscation and should be used with caution - and this one is 
>> worse.
>
>  Yeah i guess extra complexity for assisting tools 
> (auto-completion and the like) need to be considered as well...

I did not mean that extra overhead for tools is a deal breaker - 
just that I don't like proposed feature itself strong enough to 
resort to external tools to define language subset that prohibits 
it, even if it gets accepted upstream.