Phobos for Review: std.buffer.scopebuffer

[Jakob Ovrum]

On Wednesday, 12 February 2014 at 21:01:26 UTC, Walter Bright 
wrote:
> On 2/12/2014 10:55 AM, Dicebot wrote:
>> I'd expect those
>> places in std.traits to be fixed too once someone will be 
>> working on that part
>> of code.
>
> Worrying about "lwr" vs "lower" is so way, way far down the 
> list of what we should be paying attention to it is not even 
> visible.

Wording and naming in public interfaces is very important, which 
I'm sure you agree with.

it wouldn't have stolen anyone's attention if you'd just changed 
it as soon as it was mentioned. It was already demonstrated that 
the full `lower`/`upper` is far more common in Phobos than the 
hardly used abbreviations, so what's the big deal?