Phobos for Review: std.buffer.scopebuffer

[Dicebot]

On Wednesday, 12 February 2014 at 21:01:26 UTC, Walter Bright 
wrote:
> On 2/12/2014 10:55 AM, Dicebot wrote:
>> I'd expect those
>> places in std.traits to be fixed too once someone will be 
>> working on that part
>> of code.
>
> Worrying about "lwr" vs "lower" is so way, way far down the 
> list of what we should be paying attention to it is not even 
> visible.

How can one review something more important if you ignore even 
basic style comments?