Redesign of dlang.org

[Puming via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 10 June 2014 at 11:09:41 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 10/06/14 10:12, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>
>> But yes, it's definitely not what you want to have for D. I'm 
>> not sure
>> how much can be done about that, though - except from 
>> rewriting the CTFE
>> engine with performance in mind (maybe even using a JIT 
>> compiler). Or
>> maybe it's possible to be more liberal with algorithmic 
>> optimizations
>> when the CTFE memory usage brought to a reasonable level.
>
> Can the templates be compiled in a separate phase, not using 
> CTFE but as a regular compiler?

Or, just like ctRegx vs regx, can we have a runtime version of 
diet template that runs slower but doesn't need to compile? It 
would be great for development phase.