Redesign of dlang.org

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 10 June 2014 at 11:35:32 UTC, Puming wrote:
> On Tuesday, 10 June 2014 at 11:09:41 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> On 10/06/14 10:12, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>>
>>> But yes, it's definitely not what you want to have for D. I'm 
>>> not sure
>>> how much can be done about that, though - except from 
>>> rewriting the CTFE
>>> engine with performance in mind (maybe even using a JIT 
>>> compiler). Or
>>> maybe it's possible to be more liberal with algorithmic 
>>> optimizations
>>> when the CTFE memory usage brought to a reasonable level.
>>
>> Can the templates be compiled in a separate phase, not using 
>> CTFE but as a regular compiler?
>
> Or, just like ctRegx vs regx, can we have a runtime version of 
> diet template that runs slower but doesn't need to compile? It 
> would be great for development phase.

We can't because Diet templates may contain arbitrary D code 
inline.