Register based error-handling?

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 6 November 2014 at 09:36:38 UTC, Nemanja Boric wrote:
> Maybe you could consider something like returning `Result<Ok, 
> Err>` (like in Rust) which will make you not forget to check 
> for return code.

Yes, but that is too syntax heavy. I want a language builtin that 
is non-intrusive.

Not having the logic of the program polluted by error handing is 
a significant advantage of regular exceptions (and what they were 
intented for).