GC: memory collected but destructors not called
Rainer Schuetze via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Nov 11 11:46:22 PST 2014
On 10.11.2014 15:19, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>
> Now, imagine you wanted to put this on the GC heap, and the GC would
> call struct dtors. And let's say the program is multi-threaded. First,
> the memory referred to by t isn't guaranteed to be alive, it could have
> already been finalized and freed. Second, the thread that calls the
> destructor may not be the thread that owns t. This means that two
> threads could potentially be calling t.inc() or t.dec() at the same
> time, leading to race conditions.
So, would you object to actually call the destructor for GC collected
structs? I don't think that threading problems in the implmentation of
the destructor should prohibit this.
The reference count in your example also doesn't work for heap allocated
structs that are never collected or for structs inside classes.
The pull request is almost ready to be merged, please chime in:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/864
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list