Why is `scope` planned for deprecation?

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 11/13/14 1:41 AM, bearophile wrote:
> Andrei Alexandrescu:
>
>> I agree. This is one of those cases in which a good engineering
>> solution may be a lot better than the "perfect" solution (and linear
>> types are not even perfect...).
>
> I am sure you are aware that the solution you are talking about is
> rather more complex (for both final programmers and language
> implementators) than the Rust solution.

In fact I am not! -- Andrei