Scope and Ref and Borrowing
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Nov 13 21:36:02 PST 2014
On 11/13/2014 7:41 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> I'm not quite clear; are you suggesting 'scope ref' would be a storage
> class?
Yes.
> (looks like it, but it also affects mangling?)
Only for function types.
> Please, consider Marc Schütz's existing proposal.
> Please, please, don't make scope a storage class.
Got a handy link to it?
> I have a lot of other issues with this proposal, but maybe I
> misunderstand it in principle...?
I have no idea what your other issues are and what they may be based on :-)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list