std.experimental.logger formal review round 3

[Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 31 October 2014 at 15:35:55 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 22:03:18 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
>> 2nd iteration of that idea.
>
> For me it looks like the cure is worse than the disease. Simply 
> not distributing precompiled libraries with log level 
> force-reduced (or at least not exposing it in provided .di 
> files) feels like a more practical approach than proposed API 
> complication.

There are no .di files in a dub package.
And for certain libraries the runtime overhead for checking log 
levels isn't acceptable, so we need a non-global way to configure 
logging of a library.